Macro Photography Practice..

Posted by Ravine [www] 

First time I fell in love in photography because of macro photography.. Awesome detail and awesome focus, at that time I really want to buy a decent camera for macro photo (and of course a budget friendly.. cause at that time my mother would be angry if I ask some "killing" camera like a DSLR or SLR, she will ask me: what's for?? It's too expensive for a camera!! I won't buy it for you.. T_T sigh..)

So at last my decision come to Canon Powershot SX100IS. Quite happy that time.. a good camera with a decent price, doing some landscape photo (and gunpla of course) and totally forgot about macro photo..
And now after some minor knowledge and minor experience, I decided to try it.. This is my first attempt, the object is Plumeria at my house.

Mouseover = load notes.
Macro Photography Practice..

1st attempt is the Plumeria leaves

Mouseover = load notes.
Macro Photography Practice..

2nd attempt, now the flower

Always need some tutorial from the pro here, critics and comments also welcomed..

After some thought now I really want to move forward to the next level.. How about a DSLR? Which is preferable? (not to expensive but a decent DSLR) Nikon? Canon? Which type? Price range? Lenses?
(this is because I tried some of my friend DSLR, so really want to have it too.. hehehe...)

 
Posted by
Ravine
Financial Consultant in Indonesia [www]
Previously posted items
  •  
    CopperChef in NYC [www]
    2010/01/21 03:22
    Registered on 2009/10/02. Photographer
     

    Nice start! Macro photography is one of my favorite subjects in the field. It is also one of the fields where a point & shoot can shine. Most P&S cameras have a decent to good macro ability. As a photographer who owns many cameras and does macro photography for clients, I end up using my P&S (a Lumix LX3. High end but still P&S) for most of my personal macro stuff due to ease of use and the fact that it's always easily accessible to me.

    Going up to the dSLR range Nikon or Canon doesn't matter much since you want something not too expensive and basically $1000 USD and under bodies are pretty close in terms of image quality. Second, macro photography is really reliant of the lens and some other accessories. The lens WILL be the most important thing. Is it a true 1:1 macro lens? How close can you focus? Do you want a wide-ish angle, normal or telephoto macro lens? That decision affects how much background will be in your photo and how close you will need to be to your subject. When choosing a lens, do a little research to make sure its a real macro lens and isnt "having macro abilities or macro functions." This term is used in lenses that allow you to focus closer than normal but is not a true macro.

    Next is a decent tripod. Does not need to be expensive per-say but should be sturdy and all movements must be able to be locked down securely. Nothing worse than framing a shot perfectly then having to fight a tripod that keeps drifting down.

    My personal setup is Nikon based for dSLR. On a cropped sensor body, the 60mm micro is amazing. You end up being pretty close with a bit more of the background but at $4-500-ish is a great lens to have for macro, portrait and general photography. I also use the 105mm micro which is even nicer since it allows you to be further from the subject but it's closer to $900. To save some money the older Nikon 55mm can be had for $3-400 used. It is fully manual but macro isn't about speed anyway.

    Some items that might not be obvious are flexfill reflector discs. These pop open and generally have a white side and a silver or gold side to let you add some light to shadows. These will also serve double duty to help block out some of the wind if you are macro photography in the field. Wind + lightweight plants and grasses = blurry photos.

    For now just keep shooting, experimenting and learning from your photos.

    Happy shooting!

    •  
      Ravine in Indonesia [www]
      2010/01/21 14:19
      Registered on 2007/10/15. Financial Consultant
       

      Wow.. thanks a lot.. so basically lens is the main focus here..
      and of course a tripod..
      Hmm.. maybe I will get the Nikon.. Hmm.. I will think about $900 one.. my budget is around $700 until $850, so maybe I can make it hahaha..
      thanks a lot.. this is really what I needed..

  •  
    Smithy in Neo-Venezia [www]
    2010/01/21 04:09
    Registered on 2008/05/20. ~Undine~
     

    Those are very nice macro photo results! Personally do like macro photography as well, it's really amazing though quite challenging.

    CopperChef put some great advice up there. A decent point and shoot will go far in terms of macro photography and be more budget friendly (and often easier to use).

    While I still need to learn much and gain experience, have tried my hand at some macro photography using my Canon Eos 450D DSLR with the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 macro USM lens. A very nice and sharp Canon lens with 1:1 macro in case you should opt for a Canon, it has more range than the 60mm and is more popular, but costs more, so you might like to try the 60mm macro instead if the budget is tight.
    Definitely invest in a decent tripod, the slightest movement on a macro lens can ruin the shot.

    For those interested, some of my macro photos are up on my blog: http://bluebluewave.wordpress.com/tag/macro/

    •  
      Ravine in Indonesia [www]
      2010/01/21 14:22
      Registered on 2007/10/15. Financial Consultant
       

      hmm now I really wonder.. Canon or Nikon? hahahha..
      yeah I will looking for some decent tripod..
      thanks anyway will visit your blog now..


Latest Posts
Currently being read